top of page

"The Controversial Murder of Mongolian Model Altantuya Shaariibuu: Unraveling the Full Story"

murder of Mongolian model Altantuya Shaariibuu on Oct 19, 2006 full story

The murder of Mongolian model Altantuya Shaariibuu on October 19, 2006, remains one of Malaysia's most infamous and unresolved cases.


Altantuya, a translator and model, was found dead in a forested area near Shah Alam, Selangor. Her body was brutally destroyed with C4 explosives, a military-grade weapon. This gruesome detail alone sparked widespread shock and intrigue.

But the case was far from ordinary. It involved high-profile figures, including Abdul Razak Baginda, a political analyst and associate of the then Deputy Prime Minister, Najib Razak. Two members of the Malaysian police special forces, Sirul Azhar Umar and Azilah Hadri, were also implicated.

The trial that followed was marked by controversies and delays. Abdul Razak Baginda was acquitted, while Sirul and Azilah were sentenced to death. However, the motive for the murder remains unclear, with theories linking it to a submarine deal involving top Malaysian officials.

The case has raised serious questions about the integrity of the Malaysian justice system. Allegations of a police cover-up, the erasure of Altantuya's immigration records, and inconsistent witness testimonies have fueled doubts about the trial proceedings.

Altantuya's family has sought justice and compensation for her death. Their quest has been met with numerous obstacles, including the flight of Sirul to Australia, where he remains detained.

The murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu has had a lasting impact on Malaysian society. It has exposed flaws in the criminal justice system, sparked international attention, and strained diplomatic relations between Malaysia and Mongolia.

This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case. It will delve into the events leading up to the murder, the trial, and the aftermath. It will also explore the key figures involved, the theories surrounding the motive, and the case's influence on Malaysian politics and the justice system.

The story of Altantuya Shaariibuu is a chilling tale of power, politics, and justice. It continues to evoke strong emotions and calls for accountability more than a decade after the crime. As we unravel the full story, we hope to shed light on this complex case and its enduring legacy.



Who Was Altantuya Shaariibuu?

Altantuya Shaariibuu was a Mongolian national. She was born in 1978 and was 28 years old at the time of her death.


She was a model and translator by profession. Fluent in several languages, she often worked as an interpreter. This skill would later play a significant role in her life.

Altantuya was also the mother of two. She left behind a son and a daughter, who were just toddlers when she was killed. Her family described her as a loving and devoted mother.

Altantuya was known for her beauty and charm. She was a popular figure in her home country and had participated in several beauty pageants. Her striking features and charismatic personality made her a favorite in the modeling industry.

But Altantuya was more than just a pretty face. She was intelligent, ambitious, and had a zest for life. She was known for her outgoing nature and her ability to connect with people from different walks of life.

Altantuya's life took a turn when she met Abdul Razak Baginda. Baginda was a prominent political analyst in Malaysia and a close associate of Najib Razak, the then Deputy Prime Minister.

Their relationship was the subject of much speculation. Some reports suggest that Altantuya and Baginda were romantically involved, while others claim that she worked as his translator.

Regardless of the nature of their relationship, it is clear that Altantuya and Baginda were closely connected. This connection would later place Altantuya at the center of a high-profile murder case.

In the months leading up to her death, Altantuya reportedly traveled to Malaysia several times. She was allegedly demanding financial compensation from Baginda for her role in negotiations over a submarine deal.

The details of Altantuya's involvement in the submarine deal remain murky. However, it is believed that her knowledge of the deal and her relationship with Baginda made her a target.

Altantuya's life was tragically cut short on October 19, 2006. Her murder shocked the nation and sparked a media frenzy. The brutality of the crime and the high-profile figures involved made it a case of national and international interest.

Altantuya Shaariibuu was more than just a victim. She was a mother, a daughter, a friend, and a woman with dreams and ambitions. Her story is a reminder of the human cost of power and corruption.

As we delve deeper into the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case, we remember Altantuya not just for her tragic end, but for the life she lived. Her story continues to resonate, serving as a call for justice and accountability.

Timeline of Events Leading to Altantuya's Murder

The events leading up to the murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu are complex and filled with intrigue. They involve a series of interactions and decisions that ultimately led to her tragic death.

Altantuya first met Abdul Razak Baginda in 2004. They were introduced by a mutual friend in Hong Kong. This meeting marked the beginning of their relationship.

Over the next two years, Altantuya and Baginda maintained contact. They reportedly traveled together to several countries, including France and Hong Kong.

In 2005, Baginda was involved in a submarine deal with the French company, DCNS. Altantuya allegedly played a role in the negotiations as a translator.

The deal was controversial. It involved the purchase of two Scorpene-class submarines by the Malaysian government. The deal was worth approximately 1 billion euros.

Altantuya reportedly demanded a commission for her role in the deal. She claimed that she was promised a cut of the profits. However, Baginda denied these claims.

In early 2006, Altantuya and Baginda's relationship began to sour. Altantuya allegedly started to demand money from Baginda. She claimed that she was owed 500,000 USD for her work on the submarine deal.

Baginda reportedly refused to pay Altantuya. This led to a series of confrontations between the two. Altantuya allegedly threatened to expose the details of the submarine deal.

In October 2006, Altantuya traveled to Malaysia. She was reportedly seeking to confront Baginda and demand her payment. She arrived in Kuala Lumpur on October 6.

Over the next few days, Altantuya made several attempts to meet Baginda. She was reportedly turned away each time. She even staged a protest outside Baginda's house.

On October 19, 2006, Altantuya was abducted from outside Baginda's house. She was taken to a remote location in Shah Alam, Selangor. There, she was brutally murdered.

The following is a timeline of the key events leading up to Altantuya's murder:

  • 2004: Altantuya meets Abdul Razak Baginda in Hong Kong.

  • 2005: Baginda is involved in a submarine deal with DCNS. Altantuya allegedly plays a role in the negotiations.

  • Early 2006: Altantuya and Baginda's relationship begins to sour. Altantuya starts to demand money from Baginda.

  • October 6, 2006: Altantuya arrives in Kuala Lumpur.

  • October 19, 2006: Altantuya is abducted and murdered.

The events leading up to Altantuya's murder reveal a complex web of relationships and transactions. They highlight the dangerous intersection of power, money, and personal relationships.

Altantuya's murder was not a random act of violence. It was the culmination of a series of events that began with her meeting Baginda in 2004.

The timeline of events also raises several questions. What was the nature of Altantuya's involvement in the submarine deal? Why did Baginda refuse to pay her? What led to her abduction and murder?

These questions form the basis of the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case. They are the key to understanding why Altantuya was killed and who was responsible for her death.

As we delve deeper into the case, we will attempt to answer these questions. We will explore the evidence, the testimonies, and the theories that have emerged over the years.

The timeline of events leading up to Altantuya's murder provides a roadmap for our investigation. It sets the stage for the murder trial and the controversies that followed. It is a crucial piece of the puzzle in the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case.

The Discovery of Altantuya's Remains

On October 20, 2006, a group of hikers stumbled upon a gruesome sight. They found fragments of bone and flesh scattered in a forested area near Shah Alam, Selangor. The remains were later identified as those of Altantuya Shaariibuu.

The condition of the remains was shocking. Altantuya had been shot twice before her body was blown up with C4 explosives. The use of such a powerful explosive left little of her body intact.

The discovery of the remains sparked a major police investigation. The location of the remains suggested that the murder was premeditated. The killers had chosen a remote location to carry out the crime and dispose of the body.

Forensic experts were called in to examine the remains. They conducted DNA tests to confirm the identity of the victim. The tests matched the DNA samples provided by Altantuya's family.

The forensic examination also revealed the cause of death. Altantuya had been shot in the head and the body. The use of C4 explosives was confirmed by the presence of explosive residue on the remains.

The discovery of Altantuya's remains marked the beginning of the murder investigation. It provided the first tangible evidence of the crime. It also raised several questions about the nature of the murder and the identity of the killers.

The use of C4 explosives suggested that the killers had access to military-grade weapons. This pointed to the involvement of individuals with military or police connections. It also suggested a high level of planning and execution.

The brutal nature of the murder shocked the public. It highlighted the extreme violence that Altantuya had been subjected to. It also underscored the ruthlessness of the killers.

The discovery of Altantuya's remains was a pivotal moment in the murder case. It set the stage for the subsequent investigation and trial. It also marked the beginning of a long and complex quest for justice.

Key Figures in the Altantuya Shaariibuu Murder Case

The Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case involved several key figures. These individuals played crucial roles in the events leading up to the murder and the subsequent trial. Their actions and decisions have been the subject of intense scrutiny and debate.

First, there was Altantuya Shaariibuu herself. A Mongolian model and translator, she was the victim of the brutal murder. Her relationship with Abdul Razak Baginda, a political analyst, was a key factor in the case.

Abdul Razak Baginda was a close associate of Najib Razak, the then Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia. He was charged with abetting the murder but was later acquitted. His relationship with Altantuya and his connections to the political elite made him a central figure in the case.

Two members of the Malaysian police special forces unit, Sirul Azhar Umar and Azilah Hadri, were charged with carrying out the murder. They were found guilty and sentenced to death. Their roles in the murder and their connections to the political and military establishment have been the subject of much speculation.

Najib Razak, the then Deputy Prime Minister, and his wife, Rosmah Mansor, have also been implicated in the case. Although they have denied any involvement, their alleged connections to the murder have been a source of controversy and speculation.

Abdul Razak Baginda: Political Analyst and Associate of Najib Razak

Abdul Razak Baginda was a prominent political analyst in Malaysia. He was known for his close ties to the political elite, particularly Najib Razak. His relationship with Altantuya Shaariibuu was a key factor in the murder case.

Abdul Razak Baginda reportedly had an affair with Altantuya. She was allegedly demanding financial compensation from him at the time of her murder. This provided a possible motive for the murder.

Abdul Razak Baginda was charged with abetting the murder. However, he was acquitted of the charge in October 2008. The acquittal was controversial and raised questions about the integrity of the trial.

Despite his acquittal, Abdul Razak Baginda's role in the case has been the subject of much debate. His relationship with Altantuya and his connections to the political elite have made him a central figure in the case.

Sirul Azhar Umar and Azilah Hadri: The Accused

Sirul Azhar Umar and Azilah Hadri were members of the Malaysian police special forces unit. They were charged with carrying out the murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu. Both were found guilty and sentenced to death.

The evidence against Sirul and Azilah included their own confessions and forensic evidence. However, their confessions were later retracted, and the reliability of the forensic evidence has been questioned.

Sirul fled to Australia after his conviction. He is currently detained there and is fighting extradition to Malaysia. Azilah remains on death row in Malaysia, with his final appeal rejected by the Federal Court.

The roles of Sirul and Azilah in the murder and their connections to the political and military establishment have been the subject of much speculation. Their actions and decisions have had a significant impact on the case.

Najib Razak and Rosmah Mansor: Alleged Connections to the Case

Najib Razak, the then Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia, and his wife, Rosmah Mansor, have been implicated in the case. They have been accused of having connections to the murder, but they have consistently denied any involvement.

Najib's close association with Abdul Razak Baginda has been a source of controversy. There has been speculation about his possible role in the murder, but no concrete evidence has been presented.

Rosmah Mansor, Najib's wife, has also been implicated in the case. She has been accused of having knowledge of the murder, but she has denied these allegations.

The alleged connections of Najib and Rosmah to the murder have been a source of controversy and speculation. Their roles in the case have been the subject of intense scrutiny and debate.

The Murder Trial: Proceedings and Controversies

The trial for the murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu began in June 2007. It was a high-profile case that drew widespread attention in Malaysia and Mongolia. The proceedings were marked by numerous delays and controversies.

The trial was closely followed by the media. It was seen as a test of the Malaysian justice system. The involvement of high-profile political figures added to the intrigue.

The prosecution's case was based on several key pieces of evidence. These included the confessions of the accused, forensic evidence, and witness testimonies. However, the reliability of this evidence was questioned.

The defense argued that the accused were scapegoats. They claimed that the real culprits were being protected due to their political connections. This argument added to the controversy surrounding the trial.

The trial was marked by several unexpected twists and turns. These included the retraction of confessions, the disappearance of key witnesses, and allegations of a police cover-up. These developments raised doubts about the integrity of the proceedings.

The verdicts in the trial were also controversial. Abdul Razak Baginda was acquitted, while Sirul Azhar Umar and Azilah Hadri were found guilty. The acquittal of Abdul Razak Baginda was particularly contentious.

The trial ended in 2009, but the controversy did not. The case has been the subject of numerous appeals, legal debates, and media investigations. It remains one of Malaysia's most infamous and unresolved cases.



The Role of C4 Explosives

The murder weapon in the Altantuya Shaariibuu case was a C4 explosive. This is a type of plastic explosive that is typically used in military operations. Its use in the murder was a key factor in the case.

The use of C4 explosives suggested the involvement of individuals with military access. This added to the speculation about the involvement of high-ranking officials in the murder.

The prosecution argued that the use of C4 explosives indicated a premeditated and brutal murder. This was a key part of their case against Sirul Azhar Umar and Azilah Hadri.

The defense argued that the use of C4 explosives was not conclusive proof of guilt. They claimed that the explosives could have been obtained and used by others.

The role of C4 explosives in the murder has been a subject of much debate. It has raised questions about the motive for the murder and the individuals involved.

The Acquittal of Abdul Razak Baginda

Abdul Razak Baginda was acquitted of abetting the murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu. The acquittal was announced in October 2008. It was a controversial decision that sparked widespread debate.

The prosecution argued that Abdul Razak Baginda had a motive to kill Altantuya. They claimed that he was involved in a dispute with her over money. However, the court found that there was insufficient evidence to prove his guilt.

The defense argued that Abdul Razak Baginda was innocent. They claimed that he was a scapegoat in a politically motivated case. The court accepted this argument and acquitted him.

The acquittal of Abdul Razak Baginda was seen by many as a failure of justice. It has been a source of controversy and dissatisfaction.

Despite his acquittal, Abdul Razak Baginda's role in the case continues to be a subject of debate. His relationship with Altantuya and his connections to the political elite have made him a central figure in the case.

Convictions and Sentences of Sirul Azhar Umar and Azilah Hadri

Sirul Azhar Umar and Azilah Hadri were found guilty of the murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu. They were sentenced to death. The verdicts were announced in 2009.

The prosecution's case against Sirul and Azilah was based on their confessions and forensic evidence. However, both men later retracted their confessions. They claimed that they were coerced into confessing.

The defense argued that Sirul and Azilah were scapegoats. They claimed that the real culprits were being protected due to their political connections. Despite these arguments, the court found them guilty.

The convictions of Sirul and Azilah were seen by many as a partial victory for justice. However, the sentences have been a source of controversy. The use of the death penalty in the case has been criticized by human rights organizations.

The convictions and sentences of Sirul and Azilah remain a subject of debate. Their roles in the murder and their connections to the political and military establishment continue to be scrutinized.

The Disappearance and Extradition of Sirul Azhar Umar

After his conviction, Sirul Azhar Umar fled to Australia. He is currently detained there. His disappearance and extradition have

Theories and Speculations: Exploring the Motive

The motive for the murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu remains unclear. There has been much speculation about why she was killed. Various theories have been proposed.

One theory is that Altantuya was killed because of her knowledge of a submarine deal. This deal involved top Malaysian officials. Altantuya was reportedly involved in the negotiations.

According to this theory, Altantuya was demanding financial compensation from Abdul Razak Baginda. She was allegedly seeking payment for her role in the submarine deal. This theory suggests that she was killed to silence her.

Another theory is that Altantuya was killed because of a personal dispute. She was reportedly involved in a relationship with Abdul Razak Baginda. This relationship allegedly turned sour, leading to her murder.

This theory suggests that Altantuya was killed in a fit of rage or jealousy. It points to the brutal nature of her murder as evidence of this. However, this theory has been questioned due to the involvement of professional killers.

A third theory is that Altantuya was killed to protect the reputation of high-ranking officials. This theory suggests that her murder was a politically motivated cover-up. It points to the involvement of individuals with political connections as evidence of this.

Each of these theories has its supporters and detractors. None of them have been definitively proven. The truth remains elusive.

The lack of a clear motive has added to the controversy surrounding the case. It has fueled speculation and conspiracy theories. It has also raised questions about the integrity of the investigation and trial.

The motive for the murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu continues to be a subject of debate. It is a key piece of the puzzle that remains missing. It is a question that haunts the case.

Aftermath and Impact on Malaysian Society

The murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu sent shockwaves through Malaysian society. It was a crime that gripped the nation. It sparked widespread outrage and calls for justice.

The case exposed flaws in the Malaysian criminal justice system. It raised questions about the integrity of the police and the courts. It highlighted issues with the death penalty.

The case also had a significant impact on Malaysian politics. It implicated high-ranking officials and political figures. It fueled allegations of corruption and cover-ups.

The murder trial was marked by numerous delays and controversies. It was widely criticized for its handling of key witnesses and evidence. It was seen by many as a miscarriage of justice.

The case has had a lasting impact on public perception of the justice system. It has eroded trust in the institutions responsible for upholding the law. It has highlighted the need for judicial reform and transparency.

The case has also sparked international attention and diplomatic tensions. It has had implications for Malaysia's diplomatic relations and image abroad. It has been a source of concern for the international community.

The murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu remains one of Malaysia's most infamous and unresolved cases. It continues to be a topic of public interest and debate. It is a case that has left a deep scar on Malaysian society.

The Erasure of Immigration Records

One of the most controversial aspects of the case is the alleged erasure of Altantuya's immigration records. These records were reportedly erased from Malaysian government databases. This has raised suspicions of a cover-up.

The erasure of these records has been seen as an attempt to erase Altantuya's presence in Malaysia. It has been interpreted as an effort to obstruct the investigation. It has added to the controversy surrounding the case.

The erasure of these records has been widely criticized. It has been seen as evidence of corruption and lack of accountability. It has further eroded trust in the Malaysian justice system.

The Sworn Affidavits of P. Balasubramaniam

P. Balasubramaniam, a private investigator hired by Abdul Razak Baginda, played a key role in the case. He made conflicting statements in sworn affidavits regarding the case. These statements have been a source of controversy.

Balasubramaniam's affidavits have raised questions about the integrity of the investigation. They have fueled speculation and conspiracy theories. They have added to the doubts about the reliability of the trial proceedings.

Balasubramaniam's role in the case has been the subject of much debate. His affidavits have been scrutinized and questioned. They remain a contentious aspect of the case.

Calls for Justice: Altantuya's Family and International Reactions

Altantuya's family has sought justice and compensation for her death. They have expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of the case. They have been vocal in their calls for justice.

The case has also sparked international reactions. Human rights organizations and activists have rallied around the case. They have called for a reopening of the case and a more thorough investigation.

The murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu continues to evoke strong emotions and calls for justice. It remains a rallying point for those seeking justice and accountability. It is a case that continues to demand attention and action.

The Case's Influence on Malaysian Politics and Justice System

The Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case has had a profound impact on Malaysian politics and the justice system. It has exposed deep-seated issues and sparked calls for reform. It has become a symbol of the struggle for justice and accountability.

The case has implicated high-ranking officials and political figures. It has fueled allegations of corruption and cover-ups. It has raised questions about the integrity of the political system.

The case has also exposed flaws in the Malaysian criminal justice system. It has highlighted issues with the handling of evidence and witnesses. It has raised doubts about the fairness of the trial proceedings.

The murder trial was marked by numerous delays and controversies. It was widely criticized for its handling of key witnesses and evidence. It was seen by many as a miscarriage of justice.

The case has also had a significant impact on public perception of the justice system. It has eroded trust in the institutions responsible for upholding the law. It has highlighted the need for judicial reform and transparency.

The case has sparked international attention and diplomatic tensions. It has had implications for Malaysia's diplomatic relations and image abroad. It has been a source of concern for the international community.

The murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu remains one of Malaysia's most infamous and unresolved cases. It continues to be a topic of public interest and debate. It is a case that has left a deep scar on Malaysian society.

Corruption and the Scorpene-class Submarine Deal

One of the most controversial aspects of the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case is the alleged connection to a submarine deal. Altantuya was reportedly involved in negotiations over the Scorpene-class submarine deal. This has fueled speculation about the motive for her murder.

The submarine deal involved top Malaysian officials, including Najib Razak. It has been linked to allegations of corruption at the highest levels of the Malaysian government. It has added to the controversy surrounding the case.

The submarine deal has been the subject of much debate and investigation. It has been scrutinized by local and international media. It has been a source of public outrage and calls for accountability.

The alleged connection between the submarine deal and the murder case has raised questions about the integrity of the political system. It has fueled allegations of corruption and cover-ups. It has eroded trust in the Malaysian government.

The submarine deal remains a contentious aspect of the case. It continues to be a topic of public interest and debate. It is a case that continues to demand attention and action.

Human Rights and the Rule of Law

The Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case has also highlighted issues of human rights and the rule of law. It has raised questions about the treatment of foreign nationals in Malaysia. It has sparked international concern and calls for action.

The case has exposed flaws in the Malaysian criminal justice system. It has highlighted issues with the death penalty and the treatment of suspects. It has raised doubts about the fairness of the trial proceedings.

The case has also sparked international attention and diplomatic tensions. It has had implications for Malaysia's diplomatic relations and image abroad. It has been a source of concern for the international community.

The murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu remains a rallying point for human rights organizations and activists. It continues to evoke strong emotions and calls for justice. It is a case that continues to demand attention and action.

Conclusion: The Legacy of the Altantuya Shaariibuu Murder Case

The Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case has left a lasting impact on Malaysian society. It has become a symbol of the struggle for justice and accountability. It has exposed deep-seated issues and sparked calls for reform.

The case has implicated high-ranking officials and political figures. It has fueled allegations of corruption and cover-ups. It has raised questions about the integrity of the political system.

The case has also exposed flaws in the Malaysian criminal justice system. It has highlighted issues with the handling of evidence and witnesses. It has raised doubts about the fairness of the trial proceedings.

The murder trial was marked by numerous delays and controversies. It was widely criticized for its handling of key witnesses and evidence. It was seen by many as a miscarriage of justice.

The case has also had a significant impact on public perception of the justice system. It has eroded trust in the institutions responsible for upholding the law. It has highlighted the need for judicial reform and transparency.

The murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu remains one of Malaysia's most infamous and unresolved cases. It continues to be a topic of public interest and debate. It is a case that has left a deep scar on Malaysian society.

The story of Altantuya Shaariibuu has become a cautionary tale about the intersection of politics, power, and justice. It serves as a stark reminder of the need for transparency, accountability, and the rule of law.

The case continues to be referenced in discussions about corruption and political scandals in Malaysia. It remains a rallying point for human rights organizations and activists. It continues to evoke strong emotions and calls for justice.

The legacy of the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case is a testament to the power of public interest and the demand for justice. It is a case that continues to demand attention and action. It is a case that will not be easily forgotten.

In conclusion, the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case serves as a stark reminder of the need for justice, accountability, and the rule of law. It is a case that continues to resonate with the public and demand attention. It is a case that has left a lasting legacy on Malaysian society.

5 views0 comments

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page